



Pitch
b. 27-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
In these bars Chopin would consistently put accidentals in A (→FE) only next to the bottom notes of the L.H. octaves (or not at all, as is the case with the 2nd crotchet in b. 27-28). Moreover, in b. 32 the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Deletions in A , Fontana's revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
There are no accidentals before the last octave in A (→FC,FE), which results in d
According to us, it is the latter that is much more likely, as it is suggested by the harmonic analogy in b. 29-30 and 31-32. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The EE version is certainly a mistake by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
Starting from the 2nd beat of b. 33, the R.H. part was enhanced by Chopin; he crossed out the earlier version, which we present below: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
FE1 overlooked the accidentals before the 2nd L.H. crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |