mUltimate Chopin

Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 1

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

a-c1 tied in A (→FE→EE)

a-c1 repeated in FC (→GE1)

c1 tied in GE2 (→GE3)
..

The missing ties of the a-c1 third must be Fontana's mistake in FC (→GE1). GE2 (→GE3) added only the tie of c1; perhaps it is a result of an incompletely implemented revision – in analogous b. 35 both ties were added.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 3

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

..

In A (→FE) there is no  raising f1 to f1. The manifest inadvertence was rectified in FC (→GE) and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors of A , Fontana's revisions , Errors repeated in FE

b. 3

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

Ties in A (→FC,FE→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

No ties in GE1
..

The missing ties of c1 and e1 are one of a few mistakes of the engraver of GE1 in this place – see adjacent notes. All were corrected in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 3

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

c1 in A (→FC,FE→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

a in GE1
..

The version of GE1 featuring a instead of tied c1 is a patent mistake of the engraver, one of a few in this place.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions

b. 4

composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor

Slur from 1st quaver in A, interpretation suggested by the editors

Slur from 2. quaver in A (possible interpretation→FC→GE, →FE→EE)
..

a koniec może sugerować połączenie z łukiem w t. 5. Obie możliwości interpretacji końcówki tego łuku znalazły odzwierciedlenie w źródłach,

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A