Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
In A (→FE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of A , Fontana's revisions , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The missing slur in b. 10-11 and the slur in b. 12 in FE (→EE1) must be oversights of the engraver. The earlier starting point of the slur in b. 10 in GE is probably a result of the notation of FC, in which the beginning of that slur may suggest such an interpretation (Fontana probably took the bottom arm of the accent/diminuendo in A for the beginning of the slur). In EE2 the slurs were added probably after GE (in b. 10 inaccurately). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
In the main text we give the slur of A (→FC,FE). The earlier starting point of the slur in GE is an inaccuracy of the engraver, similar to the one in the previous bar. EE1 overlooked the slur (like the two adjacent ones), which was arbitrarily completed in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
A (→FC,FE) has no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
raising f1 to f
1. The manifest inadvertence was rectified in 
lowering a1 to a
1. The obvious inaccuracy was corrected in