Issues : EE revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

..

In A (→FC,FE1) there are no accidentals before the last semiquaver (in both hands), which, when interpreted literally, gives d1 and d. In FE2 was added, yet only in the R.H., where it is a cautionary accidental. GE and EE include naturals in both hands.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE

b. 13

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

..

EE erroneously has e as the 2nd L.H. semiquaver.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Terzverschreibung error

b. 15

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

2 slurs in A (→FE,FCGE) & EE2

No slurs in EE1

..

The slurs were certainly overlooked in EE1, which was corrected in EE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 15

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

R.H. wedges in A

4 staccato dots in FC (→GE) & EE

3 dots in FE

4 wedges suggested by the editors

..

In this bar Chopin again marked the articulation of the chords only over the R.H. part. As the performance cannot differ from the one in b. 13-14, in the main text we add marks also under the L.H. chords. Such a solution was adopted both by FC (→GE) and FE (→EE).
In FE, the missing mark for the 1st R.H. chord must be an oversight of the engraver.
Both FC (→GE) and FE (→EE) interpreted the marks of A as staccato dots. Although they are not as pronounced as those in b. 9-12 or 14 (the R.H. mark), we consider them to be wedges.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , Wedges , Inaccuracies in FC

b. 16

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

Short accents in A (→FE,FCGE)

Vertical accents in EE

..

Vertical accents were often used in EE as an arbitrary replacement for authentic horizontal accents (short or long) – cf., e.g. the Prelude in G minor no. 12, b. 37-38.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions