data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE
compare
In A the c1-e1 third at the beginning of b.153 (and 161, marked as repeat) is not dotted. The corresponding b. 149 (157) is indecipherable in the charred manuscript; there is no legitimate reason to differentiate them. The augmentation dots in place in FC3 (→FE→IE), GE and EE may well have been added by the copyist, who must have assumed the Chopin had omitted them (as in A Chopin indeed had a few of omissions).
Compare the passage in the sources »
See b. 149
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
notation: Rhythm