Rhythm
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The version with tied c2, coming probably from [AG] (→GE), is undoubtedly later, hence we give it directly in the main text. Admittedly, Chopinesque proofreading of FE took place even later, yet the fact that a tie was not added here does not allow us to draw conclusions that Chopin returned to the original concept, since the difference could have been of less importance to the composer, hence he could have forgotten it while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Like in b. 3-4, in the main text we give the version with tied g1, coming probably from [AG] (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 20-24
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In b. 20 and 24, AI initially contained the original concept of the L.H. part: and . category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections of AI |
|||||
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the version of both preserved autographs, which, assuming on the basis of GE, could also have been in [AG]. The version of FE, almost certainly proofread by Chopin, can be considered equal. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |