b. 95-96
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in b. 3-4, in the main text we give the version with tied c2, most probably coming from [AG] (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We add a cautionary before b1 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
A comparison with the unequivocal, concordant slurring of all sources in analogous b. 5 makes us consider the overlapping slurs of AF (→FE→EE) to be an inaccuracy. In AI the slur in b. 96 – at the end of the line – suggests continuation, which is not confirmed by the slur in b. 97. We interpret it as overlapping slurs (like in AF). In the main text we give the divided slurs of GE1, which, at the same time, are a contextual interpretation of the slurs of AF. The slurs of GE2 must be a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We reproduce the mark in AF, longer than in b. 94, as a hairpin, in spite of the fact that the arguments put forward there remain in force also here – the mark must have been meant as a long accent, which we, hence, give in the main text. FE feature a long accent in b. 98 and another accent or a hairpin in b. 99, which results from the transition to a new page in this edition. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary before f1. category imprint: Editorial revisions |