mUltimate Chopin

Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 91

composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major

Short pedal in A1 (→FE→EE)

Longer pedal in GE

Our variant suggestion
..

The shorter pedal in A1 guarantees the clarity of the harmonic sequence and does not intermingle the c1-b semitone. On the other hand, the longer pedal in GE offers a fuller sound and preserves the bass note. Since the advantages and disadvantages of both versions are equal, in the main text we suggest a variant solution.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

b. 92

composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major

..

There is a visible deletion at the beginning of the bar on the top stave in A1. It was most probably the original version in the form of the f1-c2 fifth.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 92-96

composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major

No marking in sources

[] suggested by the editors
..

In b. 92 and 96 the Chopinesque pedalling does not take into account the cluster of the g1 delay with its f1 resolution in any of the sources. Therefore, the composer treated those places differently than in b. 91 and analog. It is difficult to say what the reason for that decision was, whether it was a later introduction of those two delays (see b. 96), a slightly higher register, which caused that the resulting semitone was less noticeable, or another factor. Anyway, in the main text we suggest a notation analogous to the one used in that group of bars. From the practical point of view, the best solution seems to be a pedal change on the 2nd beat of the bar combined with 'harmonic legato' in the L.H., i.e. holding d1 and a with fingers until the pedal change. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 93-95

composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major

3 slurs in A1 (→FE→EE)

1 slur in GE
..

Both authentic versions of the slurring may be considered equal. In the main text we give the version of A1 due to the reasons indicated in the note to b. 74-75 (one of them being the deletion of the continuous slur over b. 93 in A1 and the addition of a corresponding ending of the slur over the 1st crotchet in that bar and of the beginning of a new slur over the 2nd crotchet).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 93

composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major

  in A1 (→FE→EE)

No markings in GE

( ) suggested by the editors
..

In the main text we suggest – in a variant form – the pedalling entered into A1 (→FE→EE). According to us, the articulation of the beginning of the L.H. motif, which is different in GE, shall not prevent the use of that pedalling. In GE there are also no pedalling markings in b. 95, which suggests the composer's three-bar moment of distraction at the time of writing [A2].

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions