Issues : Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 494-507

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

7 five-note slurs in A (contextual interpretation→FCGE)

6 five-note slurs & 1 longer in FE

5 five-note slurs & 2 longer in EE

..

The analysis of the slurs of A used in the ostinato figures of the R.H. bottom/middle voice leads to the conclusion that slurs other than 5-note long – the shorter slur in b. 498 and the one in b. 502 suggesting continuation at the end of the line – are most probably a result of inaccurate notation. Therefore, it is the 5-note slurs that we give in the main text as the only version. In FE (→EE) the slur in b. 502 was led to b. 503, while in EE it was also the slur in b. 504-505 that was extended in a similar manner. Taking into account a broader context – longer slurs in b. 508-515 as well as in similar b. 310-333 and 412-435 – we suggest six-note slurs as an alternative solution in all discussed bars.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation

b. 497-498

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur in bar 497 in A (→FC,FEEE)

Slur to bar 498 in GE

..

The slur of A (→FC,FEEE) must be inaccurate, which is proven by:

  • a comparison with almost all analogous motifs in this section (except for b. 507-508);
  • the traces of prolonging the slurs, visible in A, initially also encompassing only 2 crotchets – cf. b. 495-496, 501-502, 503-504 and 513-514).

There is a similar situation in b. 507-508.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Corrections in A , GE revisions

b. 504-505

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur in bar 504 in A (contextual interpretation→FEEE) & GE2 (→GE3)

Slur to bar 505 in FC

No slur in GE1

..

The ending of the slur of A is unclear; according to us, the final part of the slur, bent in the opposite direction, is a remaining part of an uncontrolled, further movement of the hand after finishing the two-note slur (like in the entire fragment). It misled Fontana, who led the slur to the next bar in FC, whereas FE (→EE) reproduced that slur in accordance with the scheme. GE1 omitted the slur of FC, which did not fit with the others, while subsequent GE added a slur over the 2nd and 3rd crotchets, undoubtedly intended by Chopin.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 505-506

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Two-note slur in A (→FCGE)

Whole-bar slur in FE

4-notes slur in EE

..

The inaccurate slur of A, which starts slightly too early, was misinterpreted in FE (→EE). In turn, the inaccuracy of FE – the end of the slur in b. 505 suggests continuation, which is not confirmed by b. 506 in a new line, which does not contain an ending of that slur – resulted in a further erroneous extension of the slur in EE.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 507-508

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur in bar 507 A (→FC)

Slur to bar 508 in FE (→EE) & GE

..

Just like in b. 497-498, the slur of A (→FC) must be inaccurate.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , FE revisions