b. 425-426
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The lack of a tie to c1 in GE1 is undoubtedly an error resulting presumably from an inaccuracy in FC which has this tie only in b. 426 (on a new staff). The tie was added in GE2 (→GE3). See also b. 424-425. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 427
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 428-432
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling entered by Chopin into FC (→GE) and added by him in the proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 434
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The mark in A, like in analogous b. 332, is most probably a reversed long accent, and this is the version we give in the main text. All the remaining sources reproduced it inaccurately, moving it to the right and sometimes also extending it. We suggest a common long accent as an alternative version, as written by Chopin in FC in analogous b. 332. It is likely that the change was also to apply to the discussed bar: overlooking proofreading one of the analogous places is one of Chopin's typical inaccuracies. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing slur over the written-out arpeggio is most probably an oversight of the copyist. The slur was added in GE2 (→GE3), probably on the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 332-333. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |