Issues : GE revisions
b. 64-67
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur of FE starts from the beginning of the line of text; at the same time, its beginning suggests continuation from the previous bar. That fact indicates that the initial part of the slur was overlooked, which we amend in the main text by starting the slur at the beginning of the two-part progression. The slur was identically prolonged in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We add a cautionary before a2 in the main text. The accidental was added in FEH as well as in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In GE1, the 2nd quaver in the L.H. is a c1. The patent mistake is proven by the before that note, totally unjustified before c1, and the version of analogous bar 294. The correct b was introduced already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 68-70
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The staccato dots over the quavers in the R.H. in the second halves of these bars are an arbitrary revision of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 68-70
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In bars 68 and 70, GE3 arbitrarily provided the first two quavers in the R.H. with slurs. It is a part of a large-scale revision of performance indications in this Tutti. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |