Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 420
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato dots in the 2nd half of the bar is the last of a few mistakes and inaccuracies committed in FE in this bar. The markings were added in the remaining editions; however, it is only EE and GE3 that added them in accordance with the R.H. part. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 421
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 428
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with analogous bars 176, 184 and 420 suggests an oversight of 2 or 4 staccato dots in [A] or FE. In the main text, we add dots only under the last quaver in both hands, after bars 176 and 184, in which, like here, the slurs reach the quaver in the middle of the bar. The additions in GE refer to bar 420, while GE3 also changed the slurs accordingly. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 429
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2), distorting the sequence of bass (implemented by cellos and double basses), must be erroneous. However, the traces of proofreading visible in FE prove that it was the engraver of this edition that committed a mistake, yet in GE1 the note was revised by adding an admittedly overlooked category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE is missing the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
before a1 was probably added in the last phase of proofreading of 
