Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 280
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems to be unlikely that the missing e on the 3rd quaver could have been considered a mistake, which could have been suggested by a comparison with analogous bars. In FE, a corresponding note is absent also in the next bar, thus both bars refer to the shape of the accompaniment in the previous phrase (bars 272-279). Therefore, we consider the revisions of EE and GE3 to be unjustified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the 1st half of the bar in FE, the secondary beam is erroneously placed between the 2nd and 3rd notes of the bottom voice. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 297-299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), all octaves in the L.H. in bar 297 and the first two in bar 299 are written in an abbreviated manner (top notes with 8s under them). According to us, one of those digits – the last in bar 297 – was perhaps left by mistake, which is indicated by a comparison with analogous bar 69. However, we do not suggest that version here, since the entire Tutti shows numerous minor differences between the first and second time, whereas the aforementioned quaver is provided with a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
|||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of EE and GE3 is a revision unifying this bar with analogous bar 324. It cannot be ruled out that FE misinterpreted the notation of [A] in this place, hence that version may be considered an equal variant. However, in the main text we preserve the notation of FE (→GE1→GE2), which, despite being apparently less accurate, suggests a performance nuance that was perhaps intended by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The added wedge may be considered justified – in analogous bars the respective note is always marked staccato. In spite of that, in the main text we preserve the version of FE (→GE1→GE2), since the note may be considered to be the first appearance of the top pedal note, and it cannot be excluded that Chopin imagined it being performed differently than before. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
mark in bar 297, which may be considered a justification of the sound enhanced with an octave.
