Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 152
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The wedge of GE is probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
|||||||
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we suggest the accent added by Chopin in FED as a possible clarification of performance. While writing the Concerto, Chopin could have considered an emphasis on the minor subdominant, breaking the strictly diatonic sequence and preparing the eventual consolidation of a new key, A major, to be obvious; however, the pupil's performance of this place apparently lacked in the relevant importance. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
b. 208-209
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A later beginning of the mark in GE1 (→GE2) must be an inaccuracy resulting from having divided these bars into two great staves. GE3 prolonged the mark yet did not repeat its range from FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||
b. 212
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing accent in GE is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, although the mark could have also been added only just in the last proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato wedges in GE most probably result from distraction of the engraver of GE1 – he overlooked also three slurs in this bar as well as a note in bar 230. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |