The absence of a slur over the beginning of the ascending semiquaver fragment of the phrase must be considered an inaccuracy of notation, perhaps caused by the transition into a new line in FE. It results from a comparison with analogous figures – the discussed place is the only one in which those two semiquavers are not encompassed with a slur. The additions introduced both in EE and GE3 may be considered justified. In the main text, we suggest the first solution, since it is more frequent in the compared analogous bars.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs