|
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing pedalling in these two bars must be considered Chopin's inadvertence (or the engraver's oversight). In the main text, we suggest adding the marks after similar figures, e.g. in bar 37. A similar situation in bars 85-86. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing accent in GE is most probably an oversight. One could have doubts whether the accent corresponds to Chopin's notation accurately – according to us, a short category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||
|
b. 36-39
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, there are visible traces of a correction performed to the slur that originally did not encompass the last two semiquaver triplets. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
, mildly emphasisng the beginning of an ornamental figure, would be more suitable in this case. However, the notation of 
