Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 30

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Short accent in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE

Long accent suggested by the editors

..

The missing accent is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. In the main text, we suggest a long accent, since the shorter mark in FE is most probably related to its atypical placement between two top elements of the chord. Generally, it is impossible to reproduce such a notation, sometimes used by Chopin, e.g. in the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 2nd mov., bar 36, in print accurately.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , Errors in GE

b. 31

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

 in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE

..

The missing  hairpin in GE is most probably a result of an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 34

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Short accents in FE (→GE)

Vertical accents in EE

..

An arbitrary change of horizontal accents to vertical ones is one of the characteristic manners of the engravers or revisers of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 34

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)

Dot in GE

..

The staccato dot present in GE is most probably an inaccuracy of the engraver of that edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Wedges

b. 35-36

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Short accents in #FE (→GE,EE)

Long accents suggested by the editors

..

In FE, three subsequent accents under the dotted quavers, although they look like short ones, are of a slightly different length, related to the length of the beam above them. It may indicate that the engraver considered them to be diminuendoes (), which, in turn, points to the use of long accents by Chopin. Cf. similar motifs in the 1st mov. of the Concerto, bars 4-6.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents