b. 20
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
A long, locally topmost note is a typical place for a long accent, a mark Chopin would use most often. Therefore, supposing an inaccurate reproduction of the notation by the engraver of FE, in the main text we suggest a long accent. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The staccato dots over the last two quavers were added in FED; most probably by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
 
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The traces of changes to print, visible in FE, prove that the grace note was initially printed – most probably by mistake – at the pitch of f1. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, the part of the L.H. is misaligned with the R.H. in the 2nd half of the bar – the last quaver, f, falls already under the dotted quaver c3. The inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE, whereas the mark indicating the right synchronization is written in FEH. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Synchronization markings , Annotations in FEH |