![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors repeated in EE
b. 141
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1), the dots prolonging the E-B minim were overlooked. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Placing the category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no accidental before the 8th semiquaver in the R.H., which requires it to be interpreted as e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 378
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The mistake of FE is proved by the orchestral part, in which there is a B in cellos and double-basses, as well as by the Chopinesque correction in FED. The correct text was introduced in GE probably on the basis of comparison of the piano part with the orchestral parts. EE3 was revised probably on the basis of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 408
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |