|
b. 300-301
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), all grace notes are non-slashed in these bars, which is one of the indications of evident distraction of the engraver of GE1 in bars 299-302 (other mistakes include an overlooked quaver flag in bar 300, an erroneous last semiquaver in the L.H. in bar 300, Terzverschreibung errors in the chords in bars 300 and 302 as well as, most probably, three overlooked category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the quaver flag next to the first chord (after the grace note) was overlooked. This patent mistake was corrected already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||
|
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the last note in the L.H. is an e1. A comparison with analogous bars 284, 286 and 302 proves the engraver's mistake. It was corrected in subsequent GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with the five bars, which had already occurred, containing a similar procedure proves the mistake of GE1 (→GE2), corrected in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 303
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no slur in GE3, which must be an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
marks in bars 299-301). The grace notes were written correctly in 
3 in chord in 