![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 630-640
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bar 630, 635, 638 and 640 in FE, there are no little slurs combining the grace notes with the quaver that ends the motif. A comparison with the remaining similar bars of this 24-bar section points to oversights of the engraver of FE or of Chopin himself. In the main text, we add the overlooked little slurs like it was performed in GE and EE. category imprint: issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 632
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Stylistically speaking, the version of GE is absolutely possible – such melodic sequences can be quite frequently found in Chopin's pieces (cf. bar 610 or bar 66 in the 2nd mov. as well as, e.g. the Ballade in G Minor, Op. 23, bar 45 and 47). However, in this case, nothing supports the authenticity of that version – in similar contexts, in spite of the step of augmented second, Chopin used a harmonic note in bar 636 as well as in bar 624, 628 and 640. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 633
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of accidentals in FE, although faultless, is illogical – a cautionary
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 636
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A sharp raising c2 to c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||
b. 636-637
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of FE (→EE) are probably inaccurate, since it is difficult to find a reason that would justify their different range – cf. bars 621-629 and the remaining ones in this fragment. However, it has to be said that if it were not for the ratio of the number of one type of the slurs to the other, it would be the slurs of FE, encompassing the entire motifs, that could be considered to be more accurate. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |