b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a staccato dot also for the chord in the L.H. Such an articulation is unquestionable; in similar contexts, Chopin would often consider marks over the R.H. to be valid also in the L.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 276
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, leaving c4 without articulation markings is an inaccuracy, even if it corresponds to the notation of [A]. In the main text, we suggest extending the slur from the previous bar, in accordance with the rhythmic shape of the figuration. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 278-279
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The digits in FEH are not written by Chopin's hand, hence it is uncertain whether they come from a lesson with Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 278-279
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In both bars, FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) feature a cautionary (?) before d3. The superfluous marks were removed only in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |