![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in GE
b. 251
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no indication that the version of GE could be possibly authentic – a comparison with analogous bars 227, 235 and 586 proves that it must be an example of a Terzverschreibung error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||||
b. 254-255
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur in GE is most probably an oversight, although the addition of the mark in the last proofreading of FE (→EE) cannot be entirely ruled out. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
When interpreted literally, the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing dot must be an oversight of GE3 – in the previous GE, the dot is hardly noticeable within the 'P' letter in the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 284-286
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), there is only one category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |