![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Placing the category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 158
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with similar bars 160, 513 and 515 points to a very likely oversight of the dot extending the f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison of the slurs in analogous bars 175-176 and 530-531 leads to the conclusion that they are most probably inaccurate in both places. Chopin was not utterly careful when it comes to such short slurs over the motifs whose range is clearly defined in another way, in this case by the arrangement of beams, accents and staccato marks. Due to this reason, in the main text we unify all these slurs (we also add the overlooked second slur in bar 176), considering the endings of the slurs in the exposition and the beginnings in the recapitulation to be reliable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 179-193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, all category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 187
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with the slurs of similar figures of this section (from bar 179) proves that the slur of FE (→GE1→GE2) is inaccurate, which, actually, could have had its origin in the careless notation of [A]. In the main text, we include the corresponding correction introduced in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |