Rhythm
b. 81-82
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The tie of B, added in EE by Fontana, is most probably inauthentic. A comparison with analogous bars in the solo part, bars 238-239 and 242-243, suggests, however, a possibility that the tie could have been overlooked by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 88-89
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing extension of the 5th quaver is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, the repeated quavers in the L.H. are written in an abbreviated manner as a dotted minim with tremolo. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, the rhythmic value of the d1 minim is unclear – there is no stem next to it, hence it seems to be a semibreve. It can be a mere deficiency, frequent in Chopin's autographs; however, it cannot be excluded that Chopin planned here a dotted minim, like it is in the orchestra (bassoon I) and in similar bars 122 and 682. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |