Slurs
|
b. 599
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be considered an inaccuracy in this place, even if it happened to Chopin in [A]. It is proved by slurs in subsequent bars, filled with typical, conventional (although not routine) figures. There is a similar situation in bars 607-608. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 600
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we lead the slur from the previous bars to the very end of the phrase. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 601-602
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
It is difficult to determine whether the missing slur results from an oversight of the engraver of FE or from a later proofreading of FE. Anyway, the slur is undoubtedly authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 607-608
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Omission of two subsequent slurs in a sequence of similar figures of accompaniment must be an inaccuracy, although it is uncertain whether it was committed in FE (→GE1→GE2) or still in [A]. This is how it was already assessed in EE and GE3 (see also bar 599 and 611). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 609
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
