Slurs
|
b. 558
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with two subsequent bars points to an inaccurate slur of the majority of the sources. In the main text, we include the correction of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 560-561
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of EE are an arbitrary addition of the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 562-563
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur, not related in any way to the course of music, must be an inaccuracy. In the main text, we suggest a continuous slur modelled after the slur in analogous bars 211-214. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 564-565
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The separation of the slurs over the barline probably results from lack of space – in GE, the slur in bars 565-566 did not fit over the notes and was led at the bottom, which forced a break of the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 567-568
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur over bar 568 must be considered an inaccuracy. The slur added in EE and GE3 is a revision that is easiest to implement in print. In the main text, we suggest a two-bar-long slur modelled after the authentic slur in analogous bars 216-217. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
