Slurs
|
b. 471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur could have been added in FED, see the note in bar 470; it reaches the 2nd crotchet in the bar. According to us, it is, however, highly likely that Chopin wanted to use it to emphasise the d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 486
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest the slur written by Chopin in analogous bars 1-2. The absence of any kind of slurs in the first 11 bars of the recapitulation is a proof of inadvertence of the engraver (or perhaps of Chopin himself). A similar addition was introduced in EE; however, in that case it was the entire first bar that was encompassed with a slur. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 487
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest the slur written by Chopin in analogous bars 1-2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 492-493
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding slurs in the R.H. and in the L.H. on the basis of Atut in an analogous place in the exposition. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 494-495
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur on the basis of an analogous motif in bars 1-2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1-e1 step in the tenor voice.
