Pitch
|
b. 411
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In EE1, there is no octave sign over the 1st beat of the bar. The mistake was corrected in subsequent impressions of EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||
|
b. 414
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the 1st quaver in the R.H. is written an octave lower, which resulted from the erroneously ended octave sign (it ends too early) used to write the entire phrase in bars 413-414. This patent mistake was corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 415
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
FEH includes a two-stage entry, which first added a category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
|||
|
b. 416
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE2 (→GE3) was probably introduced to avoid dissonance with the C-c bass octave. It was most probably a comparison with similar bars 418, 410, 422 and analog., in which there are fourths, making up consonant triads with the L.H., that confirmed the conviction of the reviser of GE2 that the change is right. The fact that the text of FE (→GE1,EE) is error-free is confirmed by combining it with the orchestral part, in which e1-b1 in the piano corresponds with b1 in the accompanying part of violin I. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 416-423
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no sharps before the second semiquaver, placed an octave lower than the first one, of the majority of the figures in the L.H. – marks are necessary in 10 out of 15 figures, whereas an appropriate category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
raising e1 to e
1, and then corrected that erroneous improvement.
