![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Following GE, in the main text we add cautionary naturals before b1 and b2. The latter was added also in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 15-19
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The dynamic mark is written in Atut between two chords, so that in the majority of the sources it was assigned to the 3rd beat of the bar. According to us, however, the texture clearly indicates that the new dynamics should be valid already from the 1st chord, which is confirmed by the indications in the orchestral parts. Therefore, the notation of Atut is an example of a manner of placing marks within the range of their validity, sometimes used by Chopin. Due to this reason, in the main text we give category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 20-22
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We consider the missing staccato dots in the part of the L.H. to be an inaccuracy of notation. In this context, in the face of the dots over the chords in the R.H., the use of such an articulation does not raise doubts; moreover, staccato marks for the L.H. are present in all similar places – bars 16-17 (added in a proofreading of FE), 501-502 and 505-507. In GE, dots were added only in bar 20. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |