![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 177
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accent in GE must be an oversight. The long accent in EE1 seems to be an inaccuracy, which EE2 (→EE3) tried to correct by shifting the mark slightly to the left. In such a context, it is highly likely that it is a long accent that corresponds to the notation of [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 211-212
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Six consecutive category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
b. 249
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, a short accent is almost certainly a result of misunderstanding Chopin's notation. In bar 225, Chopin used a long accent, in bar 233 – a vertical one; therefore, in the discussed bar he probably meant a long accent. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
b. 258
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A few subsequent category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
b. 269-270
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Interpretation of the mark of FE (→EE) is unclear. When interpreted literally, it is a short accent under a tied note, which does not make sense on the piano. According to us, the course of music suggests a long accent on the syncopated g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |