|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dot for the octave in the L.H. must be an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE). In GE, the dot in the R.H. was also overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 50-51
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The shorter slur in Atut (→FE→GE1→GE2) is the original marking. Initially, both slurs in the previous figure also encompassed the groups of three quavers only; however, they were then prolonged by Chopin. The slur in the L.H. in the discussed bars, written last, already encompasses the entire four-note motif. The fact of leaving the slur in the R.H. without extension must be the composer's inadvertence. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of dots in the editions must be a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE), who also overlooked the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 56-57
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in the case of portato dots, the majority of the editions overlooked an authentic slur, most probably due to a mistake of the engraver of FE. In GE3, a slur was added in bar 57 after an analogous slur in bar 55 as well as a parallel slur in the L.H. part. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
in 
