data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE
compare
Like in the case of portato dots, the majority of the editions overlooked an authentic slur, most probably due to a mistake of the engraver of FE. In GE3, a slur was added in bar 57 after an analogous slur in bar 55 as well as a parallel slur in the L.H. part.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs