Issues : Errors in FE
b. 499
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||||
b. 530
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the tie of c4 must be a mistake (probably of the engraver of FE, although Chopin's oversight also cannot be excluded), which is proved by:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
b. 533
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the source version, we encounter evident, awkward in this context, parallel e-e1 and g-g1 octaves. A comparison with analogous bar 178 suggests – in the absence of arguments for differentiating these bars – a possibility of an erroneous swap of notes by the engraver of FE. Such mistakes can be found in first editions of Chopin's pieces, e.g. in the Prelude in B Minor, Op. 28 No. 16, bar 2 (in GE). Moreover, it cannot be excluded that it is the original version of that place, corrected in bar 178 and inadvertently left here. This possibility is indicated by the melodic shape of this bar, analogous to the previous figure – using a recent scheme in an accompanying figure is a natural starting point in the composing process. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||||
b. 541-542
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be inadvertence. In EE, the slurring was completed in the simplest manner by adding a slur over the part of the phrase without it. In the main text, we suggest an adequate extension of the slur from the previous bar, in accordance with the slurs in all 5 analogous places. A similar revision was introduced in GE3; however, the slur was led only to the last semiquaver in bar 541. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||||
b. 542
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur of FE is a patent oversight. The slur was added both in GE and EE; however, in GE it combines the upper notes of the third, like in analogous bars, whereas in EE – the bottom ones (there was no space for a slur between the upper ones). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |