data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato mark probably results from an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of the majority of the sources must be erroneous – omission of the last group of semiquavers could be attributed to the fact that it was entirely written on the bottom stave. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 461-462
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 463
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 463
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering of FEH, written most probably by the pupil, may be surprising, especially since in a similar figure two bars later, a different, more natural fingering was indicated. category imprint: Differences between sources |