|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, one can see traces of changing the dynamic marking – while introducing cresc., Chopin removed the previous category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
|
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the dots prolonging the F category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The Chopinesque piano reduction written in Atut (→FE→GE,EE) does not render the orchestral part accurately – in the 1st half of the bar, in FEorch (→GEorch), the bass voice, performed by cellos and double-basses, moves parallelly to the melodic line in violin I: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information |
|
|
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, one can see that the last quaver in the top voice was originally a c2. The proofreading restored the version of Atut. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|
|
b. 36-38
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 36 and 38, Atut features only the sharps raising g to g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
.
-f
.