|
b. 442
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources, the c category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 442-443
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 442-446
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dots in bars 442, 444 and 446 were arbitrarily added by the reviser of GE3 (here and in all similar places – cf. bars 416-422). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 443-444
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
As in many other places, GE3 shortened slurs in the parts of both hands, separating the quavers ending the phrase from the preceding semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 444
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, the missing staccato marks must be considered an oversight of Chopin or of the engraver of FE. Wedges were added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
2 note is wrongly assigned to the L.H. The mistake can be understood if we take into account the fact that on the last beat of bar 441 and the 1st quaver in bar 442 the parts of both hands are written together, on the top stave. In Chopin's autographs, division into voices may be unclear, e.g. due to middle notes written without stems. 
in 
