



b. 425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin would sometimes use the notation with double slurs, e.g. in the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, 3rd mov., bars 472-480, yet in this case, the addition of the top slur must be a revision of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we omit the unjustified category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 426
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 426
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in GE1 (→GE2) must be an inaccuracy of the engraver who could have misinterpreted the "encompassing" slur of FE. A slur compliant with both piano and musical logic was restored in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |