b. 343
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, the dashes marking the range of crescendo are led to the end of bar. It is an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 344-346
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the wavy lines next to the trill marks are short. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of notation – the need to trill throughout the entire value of the note seems to be obvious in this context – and extend the wavy lines in the main text accordingly. In GE and EE, the wavy lines are completely absent. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 344-346
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The hairpins can only denote long accents in this context. Chopin's original markings may have been more or less extended in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 352
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the 2nd half of the bar in FE, the semiquaver beam combines the 2nd and 3rd notes instead of the 1st and 2nd ones. The in this context patent mistake was corrected already in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 357-358
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, the mark was placed a bar too early. It is difficult to determine whether it is a mistake of the engraver or an intended revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies |