![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Small differences concerning the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
b. 77-78
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The differences in the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
As in bar 5, in view of the absence of [A], it is difficult to expressly state whether it is a tie or a slur, combining both a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
All sources are missing the ending of the slur in the R.H. on a new line, in spite of the fact that a correspondingly prolonged slur in the previous bar suggests its continuation. We lead it to the first note in bar 108, to the end of the phrase, like it is in the adjacent bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
A slurring that separates the grace note from the subsequent quaver is unnatural and points to a possibly inaccurate interpretation of the notation of [A]. However, it is unclear which slurs Chopin meant:
In the main text, we adopt the latter, taking into account the slur in analogous bar 274. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |