|
b. 237
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, the engraver overlooked the tie of the small a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 241-242
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE1→EE2), the beginning of a slur continued in the next bar in a new line in the R.H. is missing. The mistake was corrected in GE. In turn, in EE3, the notation is ambiguous – the reviser added a separate slur for the triplet at the end of bar 241 and left the extended beginning of the slur in bar 242. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in EE |
1 tied in 
in 
suggested by the editors
mark present in 
). Such erroneous swaps of those markings were quite frequent in first pieces published by Chopin in France (cf. the notes to the Etudes: in A Minor, Op. 10 No. 2, 
Minor, No. 4, bars 1, 8, 16, 26, 54; in E
