In FE (→EE1→EE2), the beginning of a slur continued in the next bar in a new line in the R.H. is missing. The mistake was corrected in GE. In turn, in EE3, the notation is ambiguous – the reviser added a separate slur for the triplet at the end of bar 241 and left the extended beginning of the slur in bar 242.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies, Uncertain slur continuation, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Slurs