Issues : GE revisions
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the sequence led in parallel sixths, the accidentals on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar (until the b2-g3 crotchet) are written in the sources as if it constituted a separate bar and as if the L.H. were significantly or totally written on a separate (bottom) stave:
We base the main text on the notation of FE, removing three least justified, according to us, cautionary accidentals – the before g1 in the R.H. and the naturals before b and b1 in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
FE (→GE,EE) includes cautionary flats before c2 and c3 in the L.H. GE also added a before d2. We omit those accidentals in the main text, since respective alterations at the same pitch were already indicated in the R.H., while performing a scale in the same key by both hands is obvious. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The version of GE1 is almost certainly a Terzverschreibung, since nothing points to a possibility of a Chopinesque proofreading of that edition. It was already GE2 that considered it a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE), leading the slur until the f2 semiquaver, from which, at the same time, a new slur begins, is probably an inaccuracy – Chopin did not encompass the entire phrase with one slur, as he did two bars later, hence it is difficult to asume that he would have wanted to obliterate a natural division of the phrase, marked by a temporary interruption of the semiquaver movement. Therefore, in the main text we include the shortening of the slur introduced in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 44-49
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In bars 44, 46 and 48-49, each of the semiquaver groups separated with beams (or ended with a quaver) is provided in the sources with a slur that begins either from the second or the first note, which is significantly less frequent. The differences are definitely of a random nature; we consider the slurs running from the 1st note to be corresponding to Chopin's intention, since they are more natural in terms of both musical and pianistic issues. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |