Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE), the dashes marking the range of crescendo are present only in bar 25. It must be an inaccuracy, most probably caused by the transition into a new line – marking the range of cresc. on such a short section would not make sense. That conclusion is confirmed by analogous bars 29-30, in which the dashes are led until . In GE, the markings were completely omitted in both analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in GE is most probably an inaccuracy of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The staccato dot instead of a wedge is most probably an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Four dynamic and expressive indications are squeezed in the editions as if they were supposed to concern the b1 minim at the beginning of the bar. It probably results from misunderstanding the notation of [A], in which particular indications could have been partially overlapping due to the lacking space between the staves. In the main text, we separate two groups of indications – > like in the previous bar and dolce defining the character of a new phrase that starts here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE |