In FE (→EE), the dashes marking the range of crescendo are present only in bar 25. It must be an inaccuracy, most probably caused by the transition into a new line – marking the range of cresc. on such a short section would not make sense. That conclusion is confirmed by analogous bars 29-30, in which the dashes are led until 
. In GE, the markings were completely omitted in both analogous places.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies
notation: Verbal indications