Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE), the dashes marking the range of crescendo are present only in bar 25. It must be an inaccuracy, most probably caused by the transition into a new line – marking the range of cresc. on such a short section would not make sense. That conclusion is confirmed by analogous bars 29-30, in which the dashes are led until category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in GE is most probably an inaccuracy of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The staccato dot instead of a wedge is most probably an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Four dynamic and expressive indications are squeezed in the editions as if they were supposed to concern the b category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
. In 
1 minim at the beginning of the bar. It probably results from misunderstanding the notation of [A], in which particular indications could have been partially overlapping due to the lacking space between the staves. In the main text, we separate two groups of indications – 
dolce defining the character of a new phrase that starts here.