mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 289

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→GE,EE), literary reading

Long accent in FE (→GE,EE), contextual interpretation
..

In this context, the sign reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as a hairpin is to be interpreted as a long accent.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 293

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→GE)

Hairpin in EE
..

In EE, the hairpin begins already on the 1st note of the bar. It is an arbitrary revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 304

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In GE, the engraver overlooked the staccato dot for the 1st quaver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 309

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→EE)

Staccato dot in FE
..

The missing staccato dot in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight of the engraver, hence we add it in the main text. The reviser of GE also added a dot.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 311

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)
..

The lack of staccato dot for the e2 quaver is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE