mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 232

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→GE1,EE)

Staccato dot in GE2
..

In GE2, a staccato dot for the b​​​​​​​3 quaver in the R.H. was arbitrarily added.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 235

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→GE) & EE3

No mark in EE1 (→EE2)
..

The missing ​​​​​​​ hairpin in EE1 (→EE2) is a mistake of the engraver. The mark was added only just by the reviser of EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 236

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE, contextual interpretation

Hairpin in GE

Short accent in EE
..

The mark placed in FE could be interpreted as a ​​​​​​​ hairpin, as in GE where it was even extended. However, in this context, it is most probably a long accent. The reviser of EE also recognized an accent in it, and reproduced it as a standard, short one. Similarly in bar 240.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 237

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

2 accents in FE (→EE)

1 accent in GE
..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 240

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE (→GE), contextual interpretation

Short accent in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , EE revisions