Slurs
|
b. 336-337
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 341-343
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the main text, we suggest adding slurs in the R.H. for similar semiquaver groups like in bar 340. The slurs were almost certainly omitted by mistake – the engraver stopped printing slurs on a new line of music. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the slur begins on the last note of the bar, yet it is not continued in the next bar, printed on a new page. That inaccuracy possibly explains the overlooked slur in EE (unless it is a mere oversight). In the main text, we include the slur of FE (→GE) and consider the notation of the beginning of bar 360 to be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the slur begins on the first note, despite the fact that in the previous bar, ending the previous page, there is a slur started on the last quaver. Since the correctness of that slur does not raise doubts – after 7 quavers marked staccato, the last one was provided with a slur and not a dot – we assume that it is the beginning of the bar under discussion that is inaccurate. Taking into account that overlapping slurs occur quite frequently in the Rondo, e.g. in a similar situation in bars 219-220, we adopt such a solution as the text of FE. The amendment in GE may be regarded as an alternative version. The version in EE, which considered the slur in bar 359 to be erroneous and omitted it, is almost certainly arbitrary. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 362-363
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
