mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 329-330

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors
..

We suggest adding a slur in the L.H., following similar bars 325-326.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 333

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur to end of bar in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 334

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur from 2nd note in FE

Slur from 1st note in GE & EE

2 slurs suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 335

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In GE, where bar 335 opens a new line, the engraver overlooked the ending of the slur in the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 335-336

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slurs in FE (→EE), contextual interpretation

Slurs in GE
..

Before the first semiquaver of bar 336 (which starts the new line), FE (→EE) has an ending of slur from above. However, the slur in bar 335 reaches only the last semiquaver in that bar, almost certainly by mistake – cf. slurs in bars 327-328. The inconsistency of slurring was removed in GE by omitting the end of slur in bar 336, and starting a new slur from the 1st note of this bar. This is certainly an arbitrary revision.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation